In order to avoid offending Homegirls and Homeboys here, I will refrain from posting a picture of the perpetrator. We all know what she looks like. Back in 2009, this Op-Ed was posted on HuffPo quoting Sarah Palin’s claim that what is now known as “Obamacare” would result in “death panels” that somehow would have
decided ordered that her son Trig should be aborted.
The Huffington Post Rachel Weiner First Posted: 09/07/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:50 PM ET
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has laid pretty low since resigning. But on her Facebook page, Palin suggested Friday that President Obama’s health care plan might kill her child.
I wonder why I do not hear allusive arguments today to Palin’s claims then. Given the now infamous “panel of men” assembled to decide exactly what kind and how much, if any, health care women should receive, I wonder where Palin is and all her followers who were crying “foul” in 2009?
There is plenty wrong with “Obamacare.” No one will deny that. The biggest fault, in my book, was the withdrawal of the single-payer option which would have obviated the conflict with religious institutions we all witnessed last week. What we did not get with Obamacare are “death panels.”
The Republicans, across the board, are bent on repealing Obamacare. Where do they attack first? Coverage of prescriptions and procedures known to be vital to women’s well-being and therefore family health and welfare. But I hear no voices harking back to Palin’s prognostication as this panel of men assembles to decide whether women live in pain and life-threatening conditions or receive the medications and procedures that mitigate these conditions.
Anyone who has lost a mother at a young age, Madonna and Rosie O”Donnell are two who come to mind, can attest to the devastation that brings to a family. There are ways, now, to prevent such losses to young families that were not available to mothers of their generation. My own mother lost her mom in childbirth when she was only six. That might have been prevented today. But Republicans think men, some of whom are educated in theology rather than medicine, should be the voices to be heeded.
Among the Republicans, and specifically among those running for President, there is one who seems to believe essentially what Palin did about “death panels” and all that horror.
I ran across this article in Jezebel today, and there is an opposing argument. The absolutely beautiful and healthy little baby, if pictures are worth a thousand words, is testament to the value of pre-natal testing and monitoring. This story is a must read.
Next month, my daughter Ella will turn 11 years old. She’s a beautiful girl, with blond hair and green eyes. She’s an amazing artist, a brilliant writer, and she can do the splits without even warming up.
And if I hadn’t had an amniocentesis, she would have died the day she was born.
She is a beautiful little baby girl, and she has the whole world in front of her. Who knows what she might become?
Full disclosure here: My sister and I were both Rh+ born to an Rh- mother. We were both born blue. We both developed jaundice, and this was in the late 1940s, so we never knew how we survived. We do know that our mom had at least two miscarriages, perhaps for this reason, one before I was born and one between the two of us.
I am glad for the procedures, monitoring, and insurance coverage that allowed this beautiful girl-child to survive and thrive.
So WHERE are those “death panels?”