Just going to put this out there #FWIW: If only Black and Latina women were getting abortions, would the GOP guys be trying to rule women’s bodies?
The answer is no.
What they want is age-old. The Catholic Church rules this way for the same reason.
They want white women to repopulate a diminishing white population – by force and by law if necessary.
White people are inexorably headed to minority status in the United States.
Even if white people remained the majority, there is no evidence that voters would tolerate racist legislation.
A few things are for sure, though. Women constitute the majority of the electorate, and we don’t care much for white men making decisions about women’s health care.
When they banish funding for Planned Parenthood, they block necessary health care for women and men: testing for STDs and cancer – blocked. Birth control – also blocked.
You balding, white-haired men do not represent women or our best interests in any way. You just want white women to pop out as many babies as possible to sustain a demographic majority in this country. What a poorly considered agenda!
Repopulation by birth rate is a cruel and shoddy agenda. Women are not baby machines.
Posted in Uncategorized, Women's Health, Women's Issues, Women's rights | Tagged GOP, healthcare, Planned Parenthood, Women's Heath Care, women's issues | Leave a Comment »
This is a must see! Happy Women’s History Month! Happy (belated) birthday wishes to Dame Vera Lynn! Thank you for your service. She’s 100!
She brought the troops through the worst times in a war almost none of us remember except through song, movies, history books. She served. She opted for her grandmother’s Irish name because she thought it sounded better than the Welsh name.
Sir Paul chimes in several times. I think he remembers her as I do: as an institution and national treasure. I guess we both remember her songs when we were kids. I was only four when my parents had to turn off the radio when “Faraway Places” came on. I cried. I still do, and I may never know why. The war was over years before and I was a little kid. But I cried.
Her song grabbed my heart. I should explain. My uncle was in the Merchant Marine. He docked in Brooklyn and Bremerhaven and passed through London. He brought back great cheese, toys from the German docks, and music.
Posted in Women in History, Women in War, Women's History Month | Tagged Dame Vera Lynn, Vera Lynn, Women's History, World War II | Leave a Comment »
Hillary Clinton delivered the closing keynote speech to the Professional Business Women of California yesterday. In her remarks, she stepped up to defend Congresswoman Maxine Waters, whom Bill O’Reilly had insulted, and journalist April Ryan, whom Sean Spicer insulted in yesterday’s press briefing.
Interesting that he said it’s a full five-day week of press briefings. This administration is briefing-shy. The State Department is not offering daily briefings, either.
Full Remarks and Q & A here:
Transcript from Time.
Hello! Thank you, thank you all so much. It is great to be back in San Francisco, a place that has a big big spot in my heart and to be able to speak with all of you this afternoon.
Please be seated and you can jump up and down its been a wonderful but long day I hear.
I want to thank Anne not just for her kind introduction but…
View original post 3,086 more words
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
From today’s New York Times.
ON THIS DAY
On March 4, 1933, the start of President Roosevelt’s first administration brought with it the first woman to serve in the cabinet: Labor Secretary Frances Perkins.
Read more >>>>
Posted in women in government, Women Leaders, Women's History Month | Tagged Frances Perkins, Women's History | Leave a Comment »
We are bloody but unbowed. Yesterday, after massive efforts of letter writing, phone calling, emailing, and petition signing, Betsy DeVos was confirmed as Secretary of Education by an historic tie-breaking vote by VP and Senate President Mike Pence.
Not long afterward, the effort to confirm Jeff Sessions, noted bigot, as Attorney General ran into an effort by Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) to read a letter penned in 1986 by Coretta Scott King in opposition to Sessions being appointed a federal district judge in Alabama.
We see how this is going.
Here are the Twitter hashtags.
“Silencing Elizabeth Warren”
Here is the exchange on the Senate floor.
The swamp gases in DC are toxic.
Stay battle-ready. This is just the beginning.
Thank you, Liz!
Here is the letter.
My Senator, Cory Booker.
From Hillary Clinton:
Happy Black History Month!
Cross-posted at Still4Hill.
Posted in Congress, Executive Branch, Republican Party, US Senate, women in government, Women Leaders | Tagged Coretta Scott King, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, Jeff Sessions, Mike Pence, Mitch McConnell | 1 Comment »
Unlike Trump, Nixon actually won the popular vote, but the clumsy CREEP-sponsored break-in at the DNC HQ in the Watergate complex eventually caught up with him.
In case you missed it by dint of being born too late or if you memory is dusty, this Washington Post article gives a pretty thorough account of Nixon’s Saturday Might Massacre as compared to Trump’s legacy tribute last night now dubbed the Monday Night Massacre.
In the dark days of the Watergate scandal, former president Richard Nixon pushed out two attorney generals and the special prosecutor of the Watergate investigation in what became known as the “Saturday Night Massacre.” (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)
On the night of Oct. 20, 1973, the United States was gripped by a constitutional crisis unlike any in its history.
President Richard Nixon, under investigation for his role in the Watergate scandal, ordered the firing of Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor handling the case, rather than cooperate with him. Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus resigned in protest, after refusing to carry out the president’s orders. Nixon went on to abolish the special prosecutor’s office entirely.
The events became known as the “Saturday Night Massacre.” It marked one of the most sordid moments in White House history, with the president using his political power to thwart an investigation and retaliate against his opponents in government.
“Saturday Night Massacre” re-emerged in the popular lexicon again on Monday, when President Trump fired Acting Attorney General Sally Yates for instructing Justice Department lawyers not to defend his order shutting U.S. borders to refugees worldwide and travelers from seven mostly Muslim countries.
Read more >>>>
Just hours after Acting Attorney General Sally Yates ordered the Department of Justice not to defend President Donald Trump’s refugee ban, the Trump administration ousted her from office. Yates, an Obama appointee, was tasked with serving as attorney general from Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration until his own AG nominee was approved. On Monday evening, Yates announced that the DOJ would not defend Trump’s ban on immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries while she was in office. Hours later, the Trump administration issued a statement calling Yates “weak” and announcing Dana Boente as her replacement.
Read more >>>>
Here is Sally Yates, American hero.
The acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, not named in the article, is Daniel Ragsdale. He remains at ICE as a deputy director, but the one-two punch stirred echoes of Nixon’s October 1973 purge.
Speaking of purges, what’s up at the State Department? There were these from last week.
There is this from today’s New York Times.
I know oust and purge are words we do not normally associate with our peaceful, bloodless transitions of power in this country, but it is probably unnecessary to remind you that nothing is normal – especially our new special relationship with Russia.
Posted in Donald Trump, State Department, U.S. Department of Justice, Uncategorized, women in government, Women Leaders | Tagged Attorney General, Donald Trump, Monday Night Massacre, Richard Nixon, Sally Yates, Saturday Night Massacre, Sean Spicer, State department | Leave a Comment »
What do we mean when we use the word “protection?” A simple Google search yields this.
the action of protecting someone or something, or the state of being protected:
“the B vitamins give protection against infection” ·
a person or thing that prevents someone or something from suffering harm or injury:
“the castle was built as protection against the Saxons” ·
a legal or other formal measure intended to preserve civil liberties and rights.
a document guaranteeing immunity from harm to the person specified in it.
the practice of paying money to criminals so as to prevent them from attacking oneself or one’s property:
money paid to criminals to prevent them from attacking, especially on a regular basis.
used euphemistically to refer to the keeping of a mistress by her lover in a separate establishment:
“she was living under his lordship’s protection at Gloucester Gate”
keep safe from harm or injury:
“he tried to protect Kelly from the attack” ·
aim to preserve (a threatened plant or animal species) by legislating against collecting or hunting.
restrict by law access to or development of (land) so as to preserve its natural state:
“logging is continuing in protected areas in violation of an international agreement”
(of an insurance policy) promise to pay (someone) an agreed amount in the event of loss, injury, fire, theft, or other misfortune:
“in the event of your death, your family will be protected against any financial problems that may arise”
shield (a domestic industry) from competition by imposing import duties on foreign goods.
restrict access to or use of (data or a memory location):
“security products are designed to protect information from unauthorized access”
Origin and Etymology of protect
Middle English, from Latin protectus, past participle of protegere, from pro- in front + tegere to cover — more at pro-, thatch
First Known Use: 15th century
It is Donald Trump’s flavor of the week.
Amid protests nationwide over President Donald Trump’s controversial immigration order, the president did not back away from his plan, saying his “first priority will always be to protect and serve our country.”
Trump released the statement Sunday afternoon, two days after he signed an executive order that halts the Syrian refugee program and temporarily suspends immigration from seven predominantly Muslim countries.
“America is a proud nation of immigrants and we will continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression, but we will do so while protecting our own citizens and border,” Trump said.
Read the full story here.
Read Trump’s full statement here.
President Donald Trump paused as he removed the cap from his pen, an executive order severely limiting immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations waiting on the desk before him.
“That’s big stuff,” the president said, and scrawled his jagged signature.
In the 34 hours that followed, lawyers would mount a frantic effort to overturn the order; politicians and protesters would descend on Logan International Airport as detainees waited behind closed doors; and somehow, at a federal court hearing in the middle of the night, they would win.
Read the full special report.
34 hours of confusion: An interactive timeline.
George Lakoff, our canary in the language mine, has something to say about protection.
The American Majority got 2.8 million more votes in the 2016 election than the Loser President. That puts the majority in a position to change American political discourse and how Americans understand and think about politics. As a start, what is needed is a change of viewpoint.
Here is a typical example. Minority President Trump has said that he intends to get rid of 75% of government regulations. What is a “regulation”?
The term “regulation” is framed from the viewpoint of corporations and other businesses. From their viewpoint, “regulations” are limitations on their freedom to do whatever they want no matter who it harms. But from the public’s viewpoint, a regulation is a protection against harm done by unscrupulous corporations seeking to maximize profit at the cost of harm to the public.
Imagine our minority President saying out loud that he intends to get rid of 75% of public protections. Imagine the press reporting that. Imagine the NY Times, or even the USA Today headline: Trump to Eliminate 75% of Public Protections. Imagine the media listing, day after day, the protections to be eliminated and the harms to be faced by the public.
Read more >>>>
Parents and grandparents of teens hope that when romance prevails they are using “protection.” Given this administration’s and the GOP’s plans for Planned Parenthood, that kind of protection is not among their priorities.
Trump’s use of this word is a protection in itself, covering ulterior motives. Words have meanings and Lakoff has been telling us for decades the the Republicans are very adept at co-opting words for their own purposes. He has long advised Democrats to own the framing.
Regulation is a form of protection. Immigration bans targeting specific populations are not protection. They are a form of discrimination for the purpose of abridging the rights of some.
Vigilance requires that we pay attention to words as well as actions. This new government will not protect us. We need to take our protection into our own hands.
Posted in Democratic Party, Donald Trump, Executive Branch, Foreign Policy, immigration, Republican Party, Uncategorized | Tagged Donald Trump, George Lakoff, immigration ban, protection, regulation | Leave a Comment »